Anjis Beach-head is a wonderful sight,
The shells maybe falling by day and by night
But whenever these whiz-bangs are flying around
We all made a dive for that hole in the ground
The M.E don't seare (??) us we have met them before
They dive from the sun with a menacing roar
So we elevate, and swing, the old gun around
And they all finish up in a hole in the ground...
The first two stanza's of a poem, that my GrandFather sent to my
my Grandmother as he served in the Light Infantry from 1940-46 across Europe.
(I believe a friend of his wrote it and a number of people copied it to their loved ones).
The Poem goes on for four pages and has 10 stanza's
So, I will use the usual preface, “I am a little bit drunk”…
you know that’s code for the fact I have no inbuilt filters.
I have had a couple of conversations with friends in the UK
and US friends on the subject of Gun control. Yes, I know it’s a controversial
subject, and yes some –or most of you- will hate me at the end of this post.
Let me state this for the record, I am not an anti-gun or a
pro-gun activist as such. I believe that anyone can own a gun as long as
reasonable checks and balances can limit the damage that guns can potentially
do. Yes, this does mean legislation and restriction. If you don’t understand
the damage a gun can have, you aren’t allowed one. If you can’t keep it out of
the reach of those that are too young to know the difference then reconsider.
Be prepared; you own a weapon of destruction. If you accept you can be pulled
over by the traffic cops, then accept a policeman can knock on your door to
ensure little Timmy hasn’t used your semi to prop up his lego-tray table. Is
this too much to ask of any sane human being?
I am British, and as such I have grown up in a culture where
gun crime was infrequent. It didn’t touch me. Even in the times where violence
was prevalent in my neighbourhood, guns were not a part of it. I come from a society
where gun culture and passion for guns is a rare thing. We even abhor hunting
of animals. I respect that I am speaking from inexperience. Have I ever had to
protect myself from someone with a gun? Well, no. The likelihood the
perpetrators would have a gun is so small, that my need to have one too is so
small. Maybe during the zombie apocalypse then yes, but I would rather buy an
axe at the hardware store – a lot more efficient I believe.
So my disclaimers are in: I am drunk, I am on the fence (as
much as the UK allows, which by US standards is probably very liberal) and I
have no experience of gun culture. I also come from Europe – this disclaimer
will become apparent later on.
Dragging my drunken brain into working.
I have spent some of the evening –which in social media
terms is a life time- trying to understand why guns are so necessary in the
USA. It is a hot-topic as I have found out and one you shouldn’t mess with
unless you are stupid or well stupid (sums me up pretty well).
The thing is I think (and yes, I am speaking for the whole
of a continent, who thereby has a right to shoot me down) Europe, just doesn’t
get it.
Regularly, I get posts on my Face Book newsfeed of another
shooting in a school, or a college, or a university, or a restaurant. Usually
suffixed with the lament of “why?”, and yes, most of us are wondering about
that too.
In 1987, in a man climbed into the town clock of Hungerford,
UK and killed sixteen people and injured fifteen others using a semi-automatic
rifle. I was 14 and I still remember the news program. Our culture, was not
equipped to deal with such an incident and who knows how many people would have
been saved if someone had shot him on the outset. We don’t and in 1988 (a year
after) semi-automatic weapons were banned. Instead of liberalizing gun control
to protect ourselves we restricted it. I am glad.
This was a turning point. If we had allowed hand-guns and
semi-automatics would the US be our standard now? Would I send my nine year old
to school not knowing if he would be one of a number shot in the seven NRA
accredited school shootings in eighteen months?
I am thinking, and typing out loud, and not as coherent as I
wanted. Did I say I was drunk? Clawing my drunken brain to rambling mode.
I wanted to know if kids where obtaining guns from their
parent’s then going to school and shooting kids, then why was it not being
stopped? The conversations all began from this article from (I admit) a UK
based newspaper. Let’s acknowledge the bias here. Do we all understand the word
bias here? I.e. knowing the stance from which our sources are derived and
understanding any political and social sway they write to promote their cause?
(I am just clarifying, because I don’t- apparently)
http://www.theguardian.com/news/oliver-burkeman-s-blog/2014/jun/12/gun-lobby-tactic-redefining-school-shootings
The gun debate mainly seemed to centre on people calling me
an ideological slave to the government and not wishing to give me information.
Probably a role they believe I filled quite well by not agreeing with them. At
the time I was intrigued and entertained. Now, a little drunk and tired, I am
just a little sad.
(Can you see where my reference to bias come from? Would an
ideological slave understand the meaning of bias even if it came and goosed
them on a drunken party? The answer is no, which nullifies the idea I am a
political sheep)
I want to explain why I
think guns are abhorred in Europe. Yes, it is subjective and probably will
be flamed.
One of the criticisms (I think) was the fact that I am, not
American. I don’t understand the culture or the history; that is true. I don’t.
But maybe, Americans don’t understand ours.
I was brought up and now reside in Europe.
In 1914 –one hundred years ago- our country started fighting
a war, the likes that had never been seen before. Forget any civil wars, or
wars of independence. This isn’t called the ‘World War One’ for nothing. People
died. Our families died. Our homelands were wrecked and ravaged.
We still feel the pain, and then twenty years later it
started over again.
Two generations of families were destroyed with war. Friends
in the US cited that ‘Pearl Harbour was a part of it’. That was 1941. 194
fucking 1. My Grandad had been in a tank for over a year before you came into
it, and my Grandad was in a fucking tank two years after you buggered off.
That’s the thing you see. Just as it’s cited that Europe’s
issue of comprehension on lack US gun control is determined by a continent and
thousands-of-miles, the US lack of comprehension of our liberalism is defined
by the same distance.
To us, the tangible feel of a gun is still painfully
obvious.
I know Americans lost their lives in World War Two, but we
still have veterans who are alive and part of peoples’ family, who go and touch
the place where their friends died. We live on streets that were decimated and
then rebuilt. There is not a family in this country that was not intimately been
touched by war. There was not a person in this continent that doesn’t walk past
a ravage of war. We drive, or walk, or live, by old air-fields, or bomb-sites.
We have grandparents who were lost, or those that survived. Never anything
in-between it seems.
America may have been in our wars, but out of the nine years
we were at war, you were only there en-masse for a few. Your families were safe
as you battled, ours weren’t.
As we commemorate the hundredth anniversary of the First
World War, I wonder how many American’s feel so intimately touched by the
American Civil War. As I pass the war memorials of young soldiers, as I walk my
son to school –knowing that every village and town and city has the same- do
you have the same? I trace my ancestry, not by when I landed on a continent,
but which parents survived a war and why?
Do you have that?
I know that many may say ‘We should get over ourselves. That
was years ago’, but as I was challenged by history dating back three hundred or
more, I wonder if we should. If Americans feel the need to cite King George III
and a war three hundred and fifty years ago, then I think we have a few more
years to go.
You can only remember your scars through your history books
– we still touch our scars.
We know arming ourselves against the government wouldn’t
have helped. That wasn’t the enemy we were fighting. We were fighting
oppression through a lack of information and education – would guns have solved
that? Oppressors didn’t rule entirely through violence, they ruled by burning
books and blinkered ideology. Am I the sheep by ensuring I look at all sides of
the argument before deciding? I think not.
I guess we will never understand each other. The US will
never understand why we don’t want guns, the Europeans will never understand
why the Americans do. However, it’s a shame that the US will have to have every
single family in their country define themselves by the death of someone they
loved –or could have loved- due to a bullet, or a bomb, or a grenade, before
they act.
We have seen the fire –it still lives with us- and we never
want to see it again.
We don’t want a gun in our house, or in our street, or in our
town.
Not because we are weak, but because we have been strong and
we need to be strong never to go there again.
Maybe, even though you don’t want to, you may see that now.
(If you can't agree to protect each other, just please protect the children - speaking as a Mother).
(If you can't agree to protect each other, just please protect the children - speaking as a Mother).